Thursday, July 16, 2009 9:22:18 AM
I'm not even going to attempt to tell you why. It is ALL spelled out.
For starters, a Liquidation Clause is what it is. It is an attempt to make whole.
If Drinks has more liquidated than it owes, then they lose. If the liquidation is not enough to cover LIQR, then they lose.
No matter either, you CAN NOT sue for damages beyond a Liquidation Clause.
Further, the entire argument is moot and invalid. You cannot sue for lost sales.
Greenlite Ventures Completes Agreement with No Limit Technology • GRNL • Jul 19, 2024 10:00 AM
VAYK Expects Revenue from First Airbnb Property Starting from August • VAYK • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
North Bay Resources Acquires Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California, with Assays up to 4.8 oz. Au per Ton • NBRI • Jul 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Nightfood Holdings Signs Letter of Intent for All-Stock Acquisition of CarryOutSupplies.com • NGTF • Jul 17, 2024 1:00 PM
Kona Gold Beverages Reaches Out to Largest Debt Holder for Debt Purchase Negotiation • KGKG • Jul 17, 2024 9:00 AM
Avant Technologies Welcomes Back Former CEO with Eye Toward Future Growth and Expansion • AVAI • Jul 17, 2024 8:00 AM