InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 17
Posts 2691
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/17/2007

Re: BCInvestor post# 36075

Thursday, 07/16/2009 9:22:18 AM

Thursday, July 16, 2009 9:22:18 AM

Post# of 86719
It's all wrong! All of it!!!

I'm not even going to attempt to tell you why. It is ALL spelled out.

For starters, a Liquidation Clause is what it is. It is an attempt to make whole.

If Drinks has more liquidated than it owes, then they lose. If the liquidation is not enough to cover LIQR, then they lose.

No matter either, you CAN NOT sue for damages beyond a Liquidation Clause.

Further, the entire argument is moot and invalid. You cannot sue for lost sales.