InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 66
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/13/2009

Re: snaketamer post# 14964

Wednesday, 07/15/2009 11:18:29 PM

Wednesday, July 15, 2009 11:18:29 PM

Post# of 130527
BOB believes Peter MIchaels' 2005 confidential letter to the Judge in his Federal Indictment case proves PM is not a child abuser. Bob- are you mentally sound?
Let me address a couple of the comments made in PM's letter. My comments are based on court documents, and proven facts.
1. PM is accused of child abuse on one of those children, and will be arraigned tomorrow in Harbor Court, Newport Beach, Ca. at 8:30 am.
2. PM has claimed in court papers that the wife he is talking about is actually a great mother, and they have a "great relationship". PM's declarations stating this are numerous, and easily obtainable.
3. Step-daughter? LMFAO! What step-daughter?
4. FOUR OF THE CHILDREN NAMED BELOW NOW HAVE FEDERAL PROTECTIVE ORDERS PROHIBITING PETER MICHAELS FROM CONTACTING THEM OR COMING WITHIN 100 YARDS OF THEM. IT IS A VIOLATION OF FEDERAL PROBATION IF PM GOES NEAR HIS "CHILDREN HE TOOK 2 YEARS TO GET CUSTODY OF."

If anyone reads that 5 year old letter and thinks PM is a good father, and his ex is bitter, then I have some Hop-ON shares I can sell them. HAHAHAHAHAHAH

That letter was a sealed document, only unsealed when the government realized PM and his attorney conned them. DOES ANYONE KNOW WHAT HAPPENS TO INMATES WHEN THEY ARE IN PRISON WITH DOCUMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN "UNSEALED"? If I could only see what PM will be experiencing when he gets to prison and the "Unsealed Documents" are processed by the inmates, it would be worth all the money lost
Good Luck to you, "my friend".....Those "ffolks" are going to have a good time with PM.. IMO, of course.