InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 148
Posts 11143
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 06/30/2005

Re: jonesieatl post# 178980

Sunday, 07/12/2009 6:25:30 PM

Sunday, July 12, 2009 6:25:30 PM

Post# of 326350
Jonsie: I've reconsidered your post. It is more disturbing than I originally thought.

Parker forwarded to you an e-mail written to him by Womble in which Womble wrote:

"At the 2006 shareholder meeting, there were 632,306,843 shares of common stock that were beneficially owned and outstanding and eligible to vote."

Well that is clearly a much smaller number than what was stated in the Proxy for the 2006 ASM. That Proxy - filed with the SEC - says that there were 766,129,260 votes, including 133,822,363 votes to which Cornell Capital was entitled." The difference between the overall number in Womble's e-mail and the overall number in the Proxy seems to be the Cornell votes.

I have no doubt Womble accurately reported what was in the books he inherited. He was not with Neom in June of 2006 when the records for the ASM were originally made. So there are several possibilities: the books were not accurate from the beginning (intentional mis-recording or mistake?), or they only record the common shares actually issued and outstanding (and not the preferred voting rights) or they have been subsequently altered.


What is even more interesting is how accomodating Parker was by forwarding your question to Womble and then forwarding Womble's response to you. If I were Neom's outside counsel, I would have told you "I can't discuss my client's business with you at all, even if you are a shareholder, you need to speak directly to the company. Sorry."




Any legal analysis I post is not a formal legal opinion and may not be relied on by anyone for any purpose. If you want legal advice you can rely on, hire a lawyer.