InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 65
Posts 10321
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 06/30/2004

Re: A deleted message

Thursday, 07/09/2009 10:58:22 PM

Thursday, July 09, 2009 10:58:22 PM

Post# of 326338
I always find it interesting ...

... when a portrayal of NEOM-relevant facts which fly in the face of differing interpretations or beliefs are labeled as 'anger' ... and in an angry way. There was nothing angry in my post at all, not one angry word, nor will there be in this one.

As it happens I have no reason at all to be 'angry' but rather I have been patiently consistent for what must be years now in my offering of facts-based and analyses-based alternate interpretations to a generally accepted "it's okay, we're okay, they're okay" pablum often masquerading as NEOM-related "DD". In FACT, my painstakingly developed and freely offered tables of scores (hundreds?) of other YAGI-clients' descent into .001 PPS territory were clear pointers to what would eventually transpire with NEOM's PPS.

As jeff pointed out my recent post on NEOM-related events was a humorous (thank you jeff) recounting of relevant facts and history, along with some speculation that NEOM history seems to be repeating itself with this company. Perhaps it's not. I'll believe it's not when something different actually happens.

If one chooses to believe otherwise I am not angry with them, nor will I attempt to persuade or debate. But I do exercise my freedom to state my facts-and-actions-based opinions regarding NeoMedia's 'progress' in an on-topic and non-attacking way whenever there are new 'events' such as the recent SEC filings.

Would that others adhere to the same rules of civility.

Best regards and best of luck,

jonesie

Yorkville / Cornell Tracking Board #board-9964


"I can think of no more valuable commodity than information"