Thank you.
Jeff,
We know that the NFE Conference presentation was successful. The welcome Reuters coverage resulting. The rating of Outperform. But based on a very limited operating history. And, particularly, from the point at which operational focus was changed to product development. The bottom line result of same being to smile about. The bringing of value. Market level soaring from sub-$0.01 levels to a High of $0.2851. And how much higher before an actual consolidation period did emerge? How much higher in the absence of prevaricating thieves coming to the fore?
The point being that many top-tier ratings services will be offering a worthwhile assessment of America's Cleaning Company come the completion of due diligence. The coming audited numbers. The year-over-year advancement. And then factoring in that which management is extremely diligent about, i.e., projections and guidance numbers. Missing not so much as even a single opportunity to get the telling message out. The July numbers. The August such.
The August/September timeframe, as earlier talked about, poised to be an environment equating to the stage set ideally. For the move upstairs. The senior listing. Assuming, of course, that management stays the course as, so far. outlined. Fundamentals-operations-squeeze play intent.
As for the M&A route?
We wait.
We find out.
Norm...
Your words:
"I have been doing this for 45 years."
"I used to work for Shearson Lehman Brothers as a Analyst for emerging growth So I know of such matters besides having a firm on the street and being a MM in the eighties"
And your responses to my posts:
"Being a former analyst I will get into these numbers with you later, However , let me say , you are getting far ahead of yourself in sequentual marketing costs, and economical slack issues. But I do like your Articuation. They need to build a much better capital struture that will support that type of growth, But we will speak of it soon'
"No stoxmagix What I'm saying is I don't care about zero debt I care about spending more money then I'm getting in, not out of the air BS Okay"
So, you'll get into the numbers with me later? And a little something I notice you're fond of saying in general. And what was it last time? A barbecue beckoning you?
You claim that I'm getting "far ahead" of myself relative to "sequentual marketing costs". With my not having so much as even a clue as to what it is you're talking about. You then disjointedly make reference to "economical slack issues". And I can only assume you're referencing the macroeconomic. And, again, you've entirely lost me. Then we have the (ahem) issue of the company's "capital struture". The apparent need for improvement. With my responding to you as I did. Pointing out certain realities.
And, so, okay.
On the marketing front we have a case of Q1 through Q3/'09 costs in the $9m area. With fiscal '09 gross revenues projected to well exceed $50m. And this stellar level of return on investment displeases you? That it? The fact of ramping up the fiscal '10 marketing budget to the $20m area comes as a great surprise to you? A baffling pronouncement?
And you "don't care about zero debt"? A former analyst cares not about a successful, rapidly growing/expanding startup being entirely debt free? You care about "spending more money then I'm getting in".
Then you're getting in?
And perhaps, at this point, you can readily grasp why it is I spoke of you making no sense. At least not to me. And there's certainly no general offense intended on my part. My being entirely open to calm, rational, sensible discussion at all times. So do feel free to point out the specifics. Getting down to the numbers. Clearly demonstrating to me just where I'm supposedly misguided in any way(s). What it is I'm not seeing or seeing wrong.
Humoring me at the very least.
And perhaps the following from Mr. Metter will be of assistance to you...
'The Company has continued to experienced significant revenue growth through the nine months ended February 28, 2009. This trend, if it continues, may result in higher accounts receivable levels and may require increased production and/or higher inventory levels. Should our cash requirements to fund these requirements as well as other operating or investing cash requirements over the next twelve months be greater than our current cash on hand, we may seek to obtain additional financing.'
And, hopefully, you've had a pleasant weekend.
Barbecue and all.
Jeff…
Yes.
And here it is...
"council (Fred) wrong again, I have posted and made comments several times on stox's posted messages"
And to what end exactly?
What have the faithful longs had to wade through? Been forced to constantly counter? Setting the record straight. The untwisting of self-serving presentments.
And let's start with pump and dump. And how about SEC investigation? Authorized/dilution? Trading halt? Reverse split?
And where the accuracy?
How about the litigation? The recent judgment? The mindless attempt to draw America's Cleaning Company into the fray?
How about the more recent claim of managerial misdeed in relation to the Q3/'09 net income figure? The fact of management having simply erred in PR'ing what they did. That the referenced figure... 'was over $2,250,000'. A simple misstatement. And , again, for any number of fitting reasons.
How about the ludicrous claim of management having padded the numbers courtesy of legions of enlisted souls dispatched to create false demand for the company's products? Targeting, supposedly, low turnover locales.
And where the accuracy?
In any of it?
Nothing but the mindless twisting of reality.
Short and distort.
And, sure, the involved succeeded. To a degree. And what exactly? A little more than a double, at best? Short at $0.25 and cover at $0.11. And small wonder why the distortion routine continues?
All the effort they put in. And for what? Realistically.
Amazing.
And about to get it in the neck in a very big way. The bottom having been hit as of the 29th. The tide having finally turned. It being a tough break that the major markets/exchanges did collapse as they did last Thursday. Reversing what would otherwise have been a significantly green session for us. But not to worry, as the fundamental, operational and technical picture points nowhere but up. Our coming trading week to see the talked about serious green.
Back to earlier dynamics. The longer-term trend.
The $0.50 to $0.70 range by late August.
Precisely that which management is working so hard to bring to fruition. The needed higher launch point.
No shortage of the necessary sparks/catalysts in the offing.
Material company events to get excited about.
A fitting return to earlier dynamics.
Fitting green.
And taking care.
You and the rest.
AI
