InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 2
Posts 413
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/04/2002

Re: justerx post# 11002

Thursday, 07/02/2009 3:39:15 AM

Thursday, July 02, 2009 3:39:15 AM

Post# of 14027
Since so many message board posters complained to the SEC pre Lyamec takeover of Global, why wouldn't they have stopped trading and said that the transfer of assets to Lyamec was a fradulent conveyance that harmed GFCI shareholders without any consideration? Why wouldn't GFCI have been required to let shareholders know the details of this transfer in a PR? Why have a shareholder meeting with Global still being stated as an asset of GFCI and why did Jerry Griffith not even know for sure if he was part of the trading symbol when called last year?