BaitNswitch stated: Re: This "gold" irritant
in response to This "gold" irritant by nps
posted on Jun 12, 09 09:56AM
"Thank you...while some are dissecting or over analyzing Dr. Moro's message, your message was the best contribution for all in the last 24 hrs regarding the thorn in everyone's side."
You can attempt to dismiss what I say but I would not even be a "thorn in everyone's side" if I did not speak the truth. The truth no one wants to hear. You and others on the company board think the stock is undervalued and the product valuable. The reality is the product is overvalued and the product will never have any significant market. It's supposed value is a result of hype by the company and all the paid promoters that have pushed the product. If the product was really ever going to be worth anything, Abbott would have proceeded with clinical trials.
Just ask yourself. How good is RECAF in detecting Breast cancer, prostate cancer, etc. Moro would give you a quick percentage answer that would be totally wrong. In reality, it doesn't detect breast cancer, prostate cancer or any other type of cancer. It does not know what type or location of cancer cells it may detect. A positive may be a false positive. A negative result may actually miss cancer cells. As a result, even using additional tests, you do not know what additional tests to use or where to look. Additional tests could generate huge medical expenses and still find nothing or the CT scans, PET scans or MRI's may have false positives of their own. IMO, the use of RECAF could cause some very undesireable consequences. Companies have attempted to market other universal markers for the past 9 years and none of them have been successful or been successfully licensed and sold. Like the doctor stated, "Interesting science but clinically a waste of time."
