SEC Charges Eleven in Stock Manipulation Ring

[Disinterested One]

Not really. It's standing policy at IHub to discourage use of the words "pumpers" and "bashers" in the interest of promoting civil discourse. If someone really is a "paid promoter", "promoter" is the word to use.

Thanks, Janice. I did not see this mentioned specifically in the TOS, and it was not explained by the admin (who seems to have severe communication/comprehension problems) when he deleted my post.

So this leads to another question: IHub at some point started to allow profiles to show that a poster is a promoter. Was this done because IHub felt some CYA need given Matt's alleged history of abetting pump&dumps? That is, do the folks running IHub think that by providing a mechanism to show who's promoting and who's just positive on a stock that they will be less liable?