InvestorsHub Logo

sf

Followers 33
Posts 1283
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/25/2008

sf

Re: hfields post# 11852

Saturday, 06/06/2009 8:29:17 PM

Saturday, June 06, 2009 8:29:17 PM

Post# of 42851
also i dont think jpm or fdic thought wmi would be so prudent about filing bk. there is no way any title to anything was transferred. wmi had a plan of action i feel wmi and weil were ready for them. you dont just get the best bankruptcy firm to file bankruptcy within a day unless their was a plan of action. i feel jpm is going through the motions of puting the seattle real estate up for sale ...using this as a front until this is settled. they cant sell something they have no title to. they also cannot build banks with the patented inner design that is held by wmi. that is infringement. until the hammer is dropped and jaime's cold hands are pryed from the money trough with the 4.4 bil nothing going to happen. they thought they eliminated their competition. they only pissed them off royally!!!! wmi will get their price for the bank and patent infringment imo. and i feel they want revenge in a big way. this whole incident of stealing wamu is why the banks are still not lending. damned if you do and damned if you dont. solvent or insolvent ...holding co or no holding co. if the fdic wants you for systemic risk of their treasury banks they will get you. but their is something bigger than them and it is the constitution and judge walrath will be adding case law that will be studied forever because of this power grab. her rulings will be published in law books for future prodigies. wmi will be vindicated. weil will squeeze them for everything they are worth....which wont be much after we're done!!!

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.