Re: Adam F and nimo Adam is very negative on CTIC, and justifiably so, but his arguments seemed off to me. He slammed the OS in the trial, but at n=84 in an indication that isn't quickly terminal you will not see much. On cardio toxicity, the drug looks to be a vast improvement on the drug it is trying to replace. And his comment "As to efficiacy, I won't even go there" was certainly snide. OTOH, the point that even if approved CTCI is a horrid investment is certainly correct.