The response rate shrank markedly from the ASCO abstract released in mid May to the actual ASCO presentation. In the abstract, the RR was 10/26 = 38.5% (<a href='read_msg.aspx?message_id=37841570'>#msg-37841570</a>); in the actual presentation, the RR was 7/46 = 15.2% (<a href="http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Exelixis-and-BMS-Report-Phase-bw-15392385.html" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Exelixis-and-BMS-Report-Phase-bw-15392385.html</a> ). Did Dr. Scangos offer any explanation for this discrepancy on the webcast? Isn't it obvious The independent review <b>"is a very conservative picture,"</b> said Renzo Canetta, head of global oncology development at Bristol-Myers