Friday, May 29, 2009 11:12:06 AM
I again draw to general knowledge of the corporate world and to general business principals known since the beginning of time. You buy something, you pay for it. You can't buy more until you pay for it. Just that simple. No smoke and mirrors.
So to just assume without talking to the company and having the CEO go on record that Drinks did not ship $150K of product that LIQR showed as "an outstanding order not filled" is in fact reckless reporting, if not slander in and of itself against DKAM. After all, you made the assumption that something was amiss. I'm making a logical contrarian response. Yet, I'm the one slandering LIQR.
You don't have to agree with "my position." It's just too easy to point out where any other "position" is with respect to mine.
Maybacks Adds Award Winning Show to Its Lineup Discusses Maybacks Opportunity • AHRO • Aug 22, 2024 11:30 AM
North Bay Resources Announces First Gold Concentrate at Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Assays 12 oz/ton Gold, 17.5 oz/ton Platinum, and 8 oz./ton Silver, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Aug 22, 2024 10:28 AM
All Things Mobile Analytic, Inc. Reports Major Growth with Over $11 Million in Revenue • ATMH • Aug 22, 2024 7:19 AM
Unitronix Announces Strategic Entry into Cryptocurrency Space • UTRX • Aug 21, 2024 10:00 AM
Mawson Finland Provides Update on Exploration Activities at Rajapalot • MFL • Aug 21, 2024 9:06 AM
Avant Technologies to Implement Robust Cybersecurity Measures for AI-Driven Healthcare Solutions • AVAI • Aug 21, 2024 8:00 AM