InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 93
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/03/2003

Re: pgerassi post# 42221

Sunday, 08/15/2004 1:31:28 AM

Sunday, August 15, 2004 1:31:28 AM

Post# of 97586
Re: InfoWorld review -- One of the reviewers was clearly biased by financial conflict. This was not a workstation test. This was a HyperThreading PC test (and hatchet job). Perhaps then the reviewer would have been sent an Opteron 2P server e325 optimized for that work.

Well, there is a thing out there they call "peer review". This article would never pass any. No numbers, no reproducible testing techniques. Just a bunch of random sensationalism thrown together. Somehow when reading the article my BS detector goes way off the scale.

Any financial conflict or not - the authors are clowns who cannot put together a decent piece of FUD that would at least appear plausible to a person with traces of common sense.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News