InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 11
Posts 1853
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/19/2002

Re: chipguy post# 12795

Friday, 08/13/2004 2:37:39 PM

Friday, August 13, 2004 2:37:39 PM

Post# of 151812
Merced was in development for over 6 years. wink


So, in that case then, intuitively, the 5 year Nacona plan claim doesn't make sense. Consider..... a brand new chip core, Merced, from scratch took 6 years. Nacona is not brand new chip from scratch. It's Prescott core, with EM64T added. Therefore, I think, a more applicable comparison would be, how long was Opteron in development, and how long would it have taken with intel's resources? If it took previous intel chip designers 6 years for a brand new core Merced, and I'm wrong about Nacona being reactive, and you are correct that it currently takes 5 years for intel to design Nacona "extensions" with core already completed, then that doesn't say too much for the skills of the current intel chip designers, now does it wink
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent INTC News