Dr.D thanks, and we're all in this together.
Each brings much to the table. Your efforts in keeping it constructive is outstanding. Unlike others, your posts try to see the possibilities in a realistic way. I to try to bring the same perspective and insight to what's happening as well as the possibilities.
I'm always one to put things to empirical and factual tests, and that is what I felt compelled to do with your post.
After I started researching your contentions, I found your figures not only to be right on the money, but conservative as you stated. I found that exciting to say the least.
If you follow my posts, I think there are more than enough positive avenues to this stock, that keeping it real makes sense. Keeping it real also will result in a more stable base over time and slow, solid pps growth. I thought your post was the most realistic post for thinking out of the box I have seen to date.
I know my further research was a long embelishment. The cliff notes for anyone interested are as follows:
Dr.D's post was an accurate projection and in fact conservative. BHP and Debeers/Kensington illustrate why there is likely more than .5 carat/tonne which Dr.D estimated, and kimberlite can indeed total in the multiple billions of tons throughout our claims, just as DrD. asserted.
Be well, and welcome aboard Dr.D.
I think you'll find the air clearer here, and don't worry, those that read your posts will find you here. I have no problem with anyone who wants to copy and paste my posts on other boards. From seeing yours on various boards, I see you don't mind either. So if you post them here, they're sure to get around. : ) Bo
