Mosaic ImmunoEngineering Inc (CPMV)

[taylorbabe]

Thanks moxa, I guess I am confused though. This is from a previous Pacer post:
"Staying this case at this time is in the Court’s best interest, because there is a high likelihood that no asserted claim will emerge from reexamination. As the chart below indicates, reexamination will affect every claim in this case. Patent-in-suit Current status of reexamination
The ’336 patent All claims finally rejected
The ’890 patent Reexamination granted on all claims
The ’749 patent Reexamination granted on all asserted claims; claim 1 currently rejected
The ’148 patent Most asserted claims currently rejected; request for reexamination of remaining asserted claims near filing The ’584 patent1 Only remaining claim, 29, already amended 1 TPL has made no counterclaim of infringement against HTC as to the ’584 patent in this case. Stays are appropriate where, as here, a stay: (1) will simplify the issues in the case;"
So is "All claims finally rejected" good for PTSC? or does it mean we lost that one? So the CLAIMS were rejected not the Patent? Thanks TB