InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 10
Posts 10150
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 08/22/2002

Re: morrowinder post# 41879

Tuesday, 08/10/2004 4:15:42 PM

Tuesday, August 10, 2004 4:15:42 PM

Post# of 97586

UPC the truth is that all of these benchmarks are pretty obscure. All of them could probably use tuning as well.


Well, we're just talking about compilation switches here. That
they didn't fix the Xeon compile is an indication that they
didn't have to. Though it's hard to figure out what happened
given the incompetence of the person doing the benchmarks.

They were originally done on an AMD ONLY REVIEW

Please provide a link to the AMD-only review on the chess
benchmark.


But the fact that intel was very competitive on super pi and other athlon favorable benchmarks(doesn't AMD win by a much larger margin in my sql under a 32 bit OS) indicates that 64 bit performance is just fine


Did they run any > 4GB memory benchmarks?


And it indicates that running 64 bit programs is a pain and it isnt for free:)


Running 32-bit programs is a pain if you don't know what you're doing.


I'm sure the amd fan boys like you are tuning the code to prove their platform isn't inferior but other than a few geeks who cares?


I'm sure that Anandtech cares about its reputation.

Why everyone should care is to provide accountability. If
Anandtech said that 1+1 = 3 on an Intel processor, I'm sure
the Intel guys would have a problem with that.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMD News