While PSPM's dimming at lower levels may not be perfect -- I can't say for sure because it was not perfect at the lowest levels on display but see my previous post -- However, their bulbs do dim to low enough levels to be competitive with any other dimming CFL on the market (TCP). Furthermore, my understanding is that PSPM's dimming CFL will be significantly cheaper than TCP, although I don't know what a TCP dimming, high power factor bulb sells for (or even what kind of high power factor TCP's bulb has)...but it (TCP) has some kind of chip technology that seems to be more expensive. Therefore, it seems to me that PSPM will at least approximate the dimming CFL that TCP has in ability (if not surpass it), and furthermore it seems that it will be significantly cheaper. PSPM's dimming, high power factor bulb will not be more than $8-$11; it could be less. What does TCP's sell for?
PSPM's edge seems to be on the lower cost, at least, plus the workable dimming to low enough levels, 1-1 more or less energy savings correspondent with dimming, high power factor, good lighting quality etc. I believe PSPM's ballast technology applied to LED lighting will also be significant.
PSPM seems to be in the works with several other manufacturers as well as multiple distributors. PSPM will easily sell enough product to make $1 and possible multi dollar land, in my opinion. Do your DD, etc...but things seemed by and large extremely positive to me.
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
