InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 47
Posts 22015
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/15/2008

Re: None

Wednesday, 05/06/2009 10:36:36 AM

Wednesday, May 06, 2009 10:36:36 AM

Post# of 192568
BUYER'S NAME DILEMMA EXPLAINED:

ok folks, sorry if this is a little rant but ever since Mark stated that the buyer will be named whether the buyout will happen or not, all of a sudden some certain "people" have changed their minds or are suddenly saying that with the buyer's name released this will still drop. Let's think about this logically for a second please. This entire time "people" have been saying that this is this low for one simple reason: it's a scam. They never said it was this low because Jared will reject a legit buyout offer, they said it was this low because there is no buyout offer because it is a scam. I agree with them in the sense that it is in fact this low because the majority of people either think its a scam or just don't have enough trust, which is understandable when it comes to pinks. Anyways what would releasing a buyer's name prove (as long as it was a legit known name)? buyout or no buyout, it would prove that this wasn't a scam and that there actually was a legit offer on the table, if the only thing holding this down is that "its a scam" or "people think its a scam" then proving its not a scam through a name release regardless of a buyout would certainly not drop the pps, it would in fact do the opposite. Please I beg people to argue this post, because if you do in fact think that this will drop if name is release, and you previously were calling this a scam, then that means you now actually believe this company isn't a scam but that just the buyout is going to be rejected. BRING IT ON...eom