investorx2... let me address your posting in reverse a bit, if you will....
your formulations for mining profits while true, stand for any company in the same scenario. however, there is one big difference for cprk, that being, there is ZERO production. so, in essence your theory is flawed up to and including copper being 1000.00 per pound.
i.e., no production, no profit. as i have said time and time again, ad nauseum.
now, as far as the part about sending someone to the mill on the company's checkbook... i agree with you 100%. inasmuch as yes, perhaps MD did in fact offer to pay out of his pocket, and not use company's funds. that could very well have been the case. however, since dotson is dumping stock faster than we dumped bombs into vietnam, well, you get the point.
and, if i recall correctly, another poster indicated, and i take poetic license here... "why send a disinterested party to the mill on the company's wallet??"
yes, i agreee there too, to a degree. but, differ in opinion with respect of whom to send. shall we send some boob who has no knowledge of the inner working of the company, and only wants to pound his chest against any naysayer??? or, perhaps did MD in fact make the correct decision in authorizing his employee, copperbull to extend an invitation to a shareholder, who, in fact is quite knowledgeable of inner workings of the company to try to defuse further dissention from occuring.
gee... i dunno.... you tell me???
AI
