InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 32
Posts 2552
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/16/2006

Re: RBlatch45 post# 25298

Wednesday, 04/22/2009 6:12:38 PM

Wednesday, April 22, 2009 6:12:38 PM

Post# of 52265
This post had shown up blank on the roster, and I thought it was a deleted entry. Now I see there was some content here:

1) I don't know what Entremed has or has not said about the partnering process while engaged in it, but if one has to go that far afield to find an exception, I'll stick to my case that any discussion of partnering talks other than the most generic possible is generally not done.
2) <<Discuss plans. Discuss strategy. Discuss what is going on that is reportable. Provide timelines that are realistic. Inform the shareholder of information that is available for dissemination. Inform the shareholder of what exit strategies are in place should none of their current plans materialize. Perform "public relations". Build confidence in the company during times of trouble>>

I think this has been done as much as is safely possible. I've already addressed the issue of timelines in another post--it could be to their detriment to say anything more than they already have. Is there really anything that they can say in general, generic terms that would "build confidence?" I think words are pretty irrelevant now, and they know it. Either they pull off a deal or two, or they'll have to sell the company to the highest bidder(s). Would it restore your confidence, or anyone else's, to hear them say that?

We will continue to disagree about the etiology of Cortex's current dilemma.

NeuroInvestment


Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RSPI News