InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 32
Posts 2552
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/16/2006

Re: iggs post# 25303

Wednesday, 04/22/2009 5:24:34 PM

Wednesday, April 22, 2009 5:24:34 PM

Post# of 52265
I'm going to make one attempt at responding to what was a pretty thought-free post:
1) You are simply incorrect regarding every element of the 'partnership discussion' question. They've said many times that they are looking for a deal, unless you want to hear them say it again for some unknown reason, that's all you'll hear, from them or any other responsible company. As I have said many times, a deal is not done until signed, and several deals have been left at, as you put it, the "altar" (I am assuming you meant "altar" when you wrote "alter", and "throes" when you wrote "throws"). If you are running out of money, and only 70% of the way to a deal, you'd better raise some, because the very fact that you are running out is a deterrent to finishing the last 30%. The Market isn't going to assume a deal any more than management is.
2) "simply reaffirm the timing of expected results": and if there was some delay, that could be used against them in a licensing process, you'd prefer for that to be public, to satisfy your curiosity, even if it is to the detriment of the company.....did I hear you correctly?

"are yet to come out and tell us why they did that"---that's pretty obvious. They need the money, and they can't guarantee another source, as was noted above, and has been noted before.

NeuroInvestment
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent RSPI News