InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 43
Posts 4091
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/13/2009

Re: doggone post# 24833

Tuesday, 04/14/2009 1:47:24 PM

Tuesday, April 14, 2009 1:47:24 PM

Post# of 58002
Why was the new paltz property not part ASFX assets?

Maybe the property wasn't included in the takeover. Who knows? Worst case scenario... they own some property that they can sell. Bottom line.. it's not important or relevant to ASFXs future.

Why haven't the details of the Technimed 'arrangement' been related?

Hasn't this already been answered? They are legally bound with an agreement with Technimed to not discuss the case any further. Both companies are in the public eye and neither want the negative impact of a lot of lawsuit talk. So they just say "it's settled" and move on with business. Simple.

Where is that 2006 filing?

You're kidding right? That was 3 years ago. Again it's not important or relevant to ASFXs future.

Where is the 75 milliion revenue ASFX was on track to make and pr'd in 06?

Once again... this has been answered. The $75M was a projection. All companies make them, few are ever right.

None of this seem like "shenanigans". It's just... business.


NEXT!