"other times you have to wait for a year, sometimes longer."
Those are my words.
This is Gold Seeker's reply to that: <The Bocx has just stated that it is stupid to be a long term holder of this stock.>
No comment needed...
Interestingly enough, GS then adds: <Looking back, does anyone fail to understand how foolish we were to think that this was a long term investment?>
Isn't he the one stating that long term investors were foolish???
Gold Seeker, I challenge you to cut and paste my words calling long term investors stupid or that it is stupid to be a long term holder of this stock. If you cannot find them, then apologize because once again, you are putting words in my mouth and they taste funny.
According to the internal email that you received by accident and posted on this board, Dr. Moro does not appear to be much in favor of hype, let alone 'love it' as you claim. I also challenged you before to find one instance you can quote in which I hyped this stock and you could not provide even ONE example. Thus, your statement: <The bocx and Moro love the hype> is unsubstantiated.
Everybody plays the stock market in their own way and I think all of them are respectable; MINE INCLUDED. Of course, if you sold at a $150,000 loss, then you have earned the right to think that your investment was - in your own words (not mine) - 'foolish'. Now, imagine the impression it makes to people reading your posts when they learn that on top of that, you spend your time posting messages (68 last week alone) about a company in which you have no stock...
In reference to your last sentences:
<The bocx and Moro love the hype. The more, the better. Push the price up, excite those investors while those in the know sell and take profits.>
So where is it? Where is the hype that churns stock so that the ones 'in the know' can take their profits? Where is the volume? Where is the price spike? Where are those profits?
And who are 'the ones in the know' that are 'profiting' from all this 'hype' that is taking place?
