InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 0
Posts 59
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/02/2006

Re: deanjanes post# 1131

Wednesday, 04/08/2009 7:34:16 PM

Wednesday, April 08, 2009 7:34:16 PM

Post# of 59551
Dean, in your Post #1131 you had stated "The SEC in our submission required me to inform investors it could take up to 2 years, which is more typical of class III invasive devices requiring extensive clinical studies. Anyway, lets hope for the best and plan for the worst as government agencies defy logic."

Since we submitted the 510(k) to the FDA on June 19, 2007 (http://www.imaging3.com/news_june_19_07.htm <--the news release), am I correct to assume that our "2-year clock" expires on June 19, 2009? If so, then we ought to be looking for some news (and it ought to be soon...)!

Btw, I fully expected this to take the two years that you had already mentioned here. With accumulation going on for so long (see the sideways stock trading action), I can only assume that some others have been expecting this as well; although with a lot of dumping at the 'bid' it seems like we have had our share of non-believers. By the time that the clock strikes the big '2' in June--we will have our answer from the FDA (no pressure, Dean...).