InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 6
Posts 1675
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/28/2005

Re: markgovols post# 157327

Tuesday, 04/07/2009 3:13:59 PM

Tuesday, April 07, 2009 3:13:59 PM

Post# of 361995
markgovols remember this REPOST;

by: balance_builder Date: Saturday, January 03, 2009 10:41:56 AM
In reply to: None Post # of 3051

How would YOU vote if Oilphant is correct and we are looking a $3.75'sh buyout in the face?????

What he has going for him in this scenario is company managment stating they are no longer sure if they're going to follow up on their "grow the company" business plan (reference: ERHC 12/16/06 CC).

Please recall Peter Ntephe's out of the blue comment when ERHC questioned their own acting CEO about ERHC being acquired and he stated in part,



"We have a definite growth strategy, but having said that, we are in a business. If someone was to make an offer that had a substantial premium, we would consider selling. But our plans are to grow this company and to enhance shareholder value."
http://www.erhc.com/en/rel/?122


Now ERHC (and especially Dan Keeney) is stating they don't know if they (ERHC) will follow thru on their stated and re-stated growth strategy due to the credit crunch affecting acquisition funding potential. "Headfake" was intitially suggested when ERHC initially stated their plan to "grow the company"???

I am, however, noting that Dan Keeney has repeatably stated to me that guidance remains unchanged in terms of growing the company....but that this guidance it is subject to change due primarily to the credit crunch.


So, if plans to grow the company are dismissed.....would they then take an offer at a substantial premium into consideration?


Bring in Oilphant. I have put together a series of his fairly recent comments. Note that he became very negative toward ERHC after David Bovell's $10 comment. He claimed ERHC would never see this figure......and further stated that the $3.75 "ERHC deal" would be a buyout. More after you look at some of his recent posts:


9-8-08 Oily said:
"Todays ERHC news is a diversion.
ERHC sell price is to high."


10-7-08 Oily pushing a deal to go thru:
"One must ask one's self, how much JDZ profit is there for ERHC with an oil price of $45\bbl?
Beware of the coming Oil price drop shock."

10-7-08 Oil again pushing deal to get done:
"ERHC deal will be done before the two DS's get to the JDZ."

10-9-08 Oily pushing that oil price drop will get deal finalized:
"Oil @ $45\bbl, the wait will not be long, ERHC will flinch."

10-10-08 Oily again pushing for a deal to get approved based on falling oil prices:
"So has anyone run the numbers on how much JDZ profit is there for ERHC with an oil price of $45\bbl?
RTQ= $77.90\bbl -8.69"

11-3-08 Oily suggests SINOPEC (IMHO) is the buyer:
"Who wants ERHC's right's of oil? only the S_ _ _ _ _ _ knows!"

11-6-08 Oily indicating buyer is mad and will keep ERHC from making acquisitions by dropping the co's sp?
"I hear chatter, ERHC management Mismanages, stock goes south, not my fault."

11-6-08 Oily continuing to question profit for ERHC with falling oil price:
"One must ask one's self, how much JDZ profit is there for ERHC with an oil price of $45\bbl?"

11-6-08 Oily mad that ERHC won't accept deal he's pushing following D. Bovells $10 comment during the RedChip presentation?
"Sometimes a ship must take on water to flush the rats overboard!"

11-7-08 Oily suggesting ERHC attach itself to co X or face serious troubles? Response to Bovells CC of $10 selling for SEO:
"ERHC is surrounded by sharks, take scraps like a remora or get eaten. Bovell 20081105."

11-20-08 Oily gets wind of ERHC carrying thru on their acquisition growth plan?
"Chatter: How clean is SEO? ERHC better hope he's...

(editor note: picture of "Mr. Clean" in his original post)

It's not ERHC's money burn rate you need worry about, it's what their planning on doing with it you should be worried about.

First it was oils drop to the $40's, now it's ERHC bought what!
That's manure!"

12-4-08 Oily further threatens to assist sp in going down:
"chatter: JDZ drilling delay 1 Q 2010"

12-8-08 Oily answers lots of questions. Suggests buyout of ERHC at $3.75 based on the falling oil prices. Co now rethinking their strategy?
"BB:
1. Is XOM the player with the $3.75 deal out there? chatter was pointing that way.

2. IYO, will SEO/ERHC bite on the $3.75 deal? oil gets to $29\bbl deal at $45\bbl hindsight will sting.

3. IYO, is the $3.75 deal a buyin or buyout deal? BO

4. Which JDZ block gets drilled first? Block 3

5. Belford Dolphin the ship to do the drilling? yes

6. Why such a beat down sp on such light volume IYO? Powers that be want ERHC to leave

7. Will the new reserves report get the ball rolling in terms of sp? no

8. IYO, is ERHC serious about adding assets or is this a ploy to get a buyer to up the ante to an SEO acceptable price? no

12-9-08 Oily suggests deal is still being worked on:
"dougc:chatter was news on 20081205. Chatter is still going, something big is in the works."

12-9-08 Oily confident that ERHC will be sold for around $4:
"tryoty: The only way ERHC sees $10\sh is through an RS or price inflation in the year 2089. ERHC will be eaten for <$4\sh"

12-12-08 Oily saying no deal made yet...sp will continue to fall as a result:
"ERHC closes below $.12 nothing has changed."

12-16-08 Oily continues to threaten if ERHC doesn't accept deal:
"BB:@$.07 they'll RS"

12-18-08 Oily makes a turn and now starts to buy ERHC just days after the ERHC CC indicates they are rethinking their strategy?:
"Should I buy with smaller blocks or bigger?"

12-29-08 Oily indicates ERHC "flinched"?:
"Chatter: ERHC deal is back on."



Take the above for what it is. If....if.....there's any life in it, I would put these suitors in their respective "potential" order for being the buyer of ERHC:

1. Addax
2. Sinopec
3. ExxonMobil
4. Korean National Oil Company
5. WB and Islamic Bank
6. Chevron


I know there are quite a few on board who strongly believe SEO is going to wait for his stated $10....which obviously doesn't come about til drilling proves up at least some of the prospects. But what if.....the price of oil.....coupled with the credit crunch.....ruined any ERHC plans of growing the company and Oilphant is correct.....and an entity offers SEO $3.75 lock stock and barrel......

Would you gladly accept?

There are some odd issues ongoing that lead to the possibility that somebody does want ERHC gone from view. The elusive drill ship.....the stated, then re-stated and re-stated again business plan to grow the company.....is NOW under consideration to be changed.....Peters out of the blue quip about ERHC considering an offer at a substantial premium.....

I fully admit that I am one of very few active posters that still give Oilphant any merit for his views. Overviewing the entire ERHC picture......and knowing that ERHC has been forecasting making acquisitions for mulitple YEARS (yes, well before Ledbetter hired on in 12/06 and David Bovell in early 07)they have put to print their acquisition talk. Recall that they did the same with the hiring of CEO/CFO....talking about how they were narrowing down the very good list of candidates etc...etc....all headfake to shareholders.

Assets. All about assets to this investor. So once again....how would YOU, as a shareholder, entertain a buyout of Oilphants $3.75 per share?

Yea or Nay??