InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 4028
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/30/2007

Re: GLENO34 post# 77342

Wednesday, 04/01/2009 1:52:48 PM

Wednesday, April 01, 2009 1:52:48 PM

Post# of 389539
Not sure, Gleno. But a guy named Taleb had this to say about the matter on his blog today. Pretty hard to disagree. Two

==================

The Treasury’s plan is unfair to taxpayers and rewards the failure of banks that didn’t understand the risks they took when using debt to boost returns in the mortgage market, Taleb said.

Subsidize Failure

“I don’t understand why I as a taxpayer need to subsidize those who failed, by giving them options so they can rebuild their balance sheets,” he said. “Taxpayers take the downside and Wall Street as usual is going to take the upside, another classical problem of socializing the losses, privatizing the gains.”

Taleb said it’s “shocking” that the government would allow banks to estimate the value of the toxic assets that remain on their books because there is effectively no market for the securities, making them almost impossible to value.

“I don’t understand letting banks mark to market, after all this incompetence,” he said. “Why don’t we allow people to mark their house at what they think the value of their house is?”
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent SPY News