Re:<"This has never been effectively done before in a cost effective and viable manner. There have been material approximations, mostly in the form of fillers or processing aids masquerading as raw materials, but none of which are remotely comparable.">
How about the company giving some reason and confirmation that it's cost effective, rather than a vague suggestion? Why wordsmith the press release?
Oh, that's right--the company likes indirection as well as building 'dead-ends' so investors can't follow up on anything.
They read this board, people ask who Simco is, why so much silence? Surfguy stated that Chad Curtis asks him to post certain information on this board, why nothing there? Nothing but suggestions from the company.
Remember they also specifically said they were trying to minimize dilution. An 800% increase in outstanding shares in the past year is apparently what they want to paint as 'minimal.'
Watch your backs on this stock. There's a really high risk of fraud here, not only because of the warning signs with the communication from the company but also with the past and present ties to fraud.
Yes, I understand your penny stock also is the real deal, created with the inventiveness of Edison and destined to be the next Microsoft. Yes, I understand that the delays are also only because your company is making their product even more revolutionary.
