Are you calling an SEC regulation nonsense? All companies are not required to put the disclaimer in their subscription agreement. Companies that have the capital or the financing in place are not required to make that statement.
Cyclone has been issuing Private Placement shares at discounted prices. They have one billion authorized shares and they are using them as we speak. That is why the SEC regulation applies to Cyclone. It is not in any way nonsense.
Here is a quote from another poster that I agree with:
If the "Cyclone miracle engine was everything it claims, the company would never have gone public and sold all that deeply discounted stock to "investors". Venture capital would have been freely available, and once they had a working, tested, and certified product the company could have done an IPO and really cashed in.
That they didn't follow that route tells you a lot".
This is the SEC required statement from CYPW:
While the Company is actively engaged in both capital raising and
licensing activities, management can make no assurances that such
efforts will result in the needed funding for the Company. If such funds
cannot be raised or otherwise generated, the Company will be forced to
reduce staff, minimize its research and development activities, or shutdown
operations. Currently the Company has cash reserves and cash
commitments to sustain operations through Q4 2008 and possibly into Q1
2009, however, such cash on hand is not currently sufficient for the
Company to expand operations at the pace that management believes to
be optimal for its business prospects.