InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 39
Posts 571
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/19/2008

Re: tryoty post# 155820

Sunday, 03/22/2009 10:52:10 AM

Sunday, March 22, 2009 10:52:10 AM

Post# of 362422
Tryoty,

Why do you make things up? Is it because I challenge you and anyone else I feel is ramping this stock with make-believe numbers and arbitrary beliefs? Regardless of whether these are held in good faith or not.

You write:

1) - "You are the one that came to this board declaring ERHC only had 136M barrels of oil, which would be non-commercial".

I have NEVER said anything of the kind. I challenged the billions barrels figures with the most recent numbers provided by Addax/NSAI, risked AND unrisked (Post #149990). Commercial or non-commercial does not enter into it as we are only a carried rights holder. Not an independent E&P company.

2) - "Now after belittling it as an investment by harping day and night about the risked numbers",

Complete toss. I neither belittle the company as an investment nor do I harp on about risked numbers (on the contrary), nor do I combine the two in any argument. What I have been saying - repeatedly- is that the investment case for this company resides in looking at both sides of the fence....the JDZ AND the EEZ asset rights, not just the JDZ. You either need to rid the blinders from your eyes or get yourself a pair of glasses.

3) - "and now for the sole purpose attacking me you want to tout ERHC's potential presalt oil???"

I have nothing personal against you to justify any attack, but when someone calls me a "tool" without warrant,I respond in kind. And as for "touting ERHC's potential presalt"...how many times must you be told that absolutely no touting is involved when one points out the existence of an eventual(EEZ) possibility. Do you not understand or are you just trying to score points by distortion?

4) - "It seems your views change depending on who you are trying to discredit. "

Look Ttyoty, I do not engage in ego trips here. If you try to distinguish a challenge to an argument (you can call it discrediting an argument if you want) from a personal rebuke, then you'll understand that any response to that concluding line is really pointless, as it is beneath contempt.

Finally, I have been in ERHC and reading this board for a number of years. I have gained much from doing so and I now feel that I have a "duty of record" to give something back to fellow co-investors.
And that duty includes not just providing insights or information, but also prudent,reasoned judgements and fact-based opinions.
Thus the only ones feeling "bullied" by such are those who are either incapable of civilized discourse or toss prudence to the winds.......

I really hate to start thinking that you belong to either category.

spp119