InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 70
Posts 10541
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 12/15/2008

Re: sunflower69 post# 16165

Saturday, 03/21/2009 3:33:20 PM

Saturday, March 21, 2009 3:33:20 PM

Post# of 103340
IMO, the decline in pps is obvious manipulation, but not by the CEO (IMO). Why else would it trade all day at .0011-.0012, only at the last minute to have a trade go thru and drop to .0009? How would the CEO do that? What is his incentive to make chump change on those trades when the value of his equipment exceeds the total value of the company the current pps reflects. Taki has it right on every time he points that little factoid out. Look, I could be talking outta my behind related to this stock and pink trading, but it just doesn't make sense. The CEO isn't corrupt or a fraud. Ask urself, if the CEO or company is nt the culprit, then whom else or what entity culd it b? I would luv 2 know all realms of possibility, just not to bash the CEO or some IR firm. Just IMHO of course.