You're being a bit redundant there bud. I guess it's best to respond with redundancy.
If you feel you have a case against Steve Sulja, go for it. Maybe that will end all of the SLJB controversy once and for all.
Of course, as of May 1, 2009, the SLJB Nevada will be but all memory unless they file the required documents with the Sec. of State.
For that matter, the Canadian SLJB which is an LLC if I'm not mistaken, may have substantially different rules than are established here in the states.
The management structure of an LLC may be unfamiliar to many. Unlike corporations, they are not required to have a board of directors or officers.
LLCs may not be treated in the same manner as corporations for liability purposes, instead treating them more as a disregarded entity, meaning an individual operating a business as an LLC may in such a case be treated as operating it as a sole proprietorship, or a group operating as an LLC may be treated as a general partnership, which defeats the purpose of establishing an LLC in the first place, to have limited liability (a sole proprietor has unlimited liability for the business; in the case of a partnership, the partners have joint and several liability, meaning any and all of the partners can be held liable for the business' debts no matter how small their investment or percentage of ownership is).[citation needed]
The principals of LLCs use many different titles -- e.g., member, manager, managing member, managing director, chief executive officer, president, and partner. As such, it can be difficult to determine who actually has the authority to enter into a contract on the LLC's behalf.
So you see, unless you are educated in business law, I think you might be far better off to allow someone with knowledge to pursue your concerns. Otherwise, you're just whistling Dixie !
