Wednesday, March 11, 2009 9:11:04 AM
Item 1.01 of Reg S-K requires disclosure of material definitive agreements entered into by a company not
in the ordinary course of business, including business combination agreements and other agreements that relate to extraordinary corporate transactions.
Therefore, it is arguable that item 1.01 does not require the specific disclosure of a licensing agreement between Neomedia (as licensor) and a licensee, as any such agreement could be characterized as an agreement entered into in the ordinary course of Neom's business (given that a principal objective of its business is now the licensing of its IP).
Note: the fact that an agreement is "material" does not mean that it must be disclosed if that agreement was made in the ordinary course of business.
My point is this: no firm conclusion about the existence or non-existence of a licensing agreemet can be drawn simply from the absence of a specific disclosure of a licensing agreement in the SEC filings. Therefore, if no such agreemeent is disclosed, I would look at the financials for evidence of licensing revenues.
Last Shot Hydration Drink Announced as Official Sponsor of Red River Athletic Conference • EQLB • Jun 20, 2024 2:38 PM
ATWEC Announces Major Acquisition and Lays Out Strategic Growth Plans • ATWT • Jun 20, 2024 7:09 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Composite Assays of 0.53 and 0.44 Troy Ounces per Ton Gold in Trenches B + C at Fran Gold, British Columbia • NBRI • Jun 18, 2024 9:18 AM
VAYK Assembling New Management Team for $64 Billion Domestic Market • VAYK • Jun 18, 2024 9:00 AM
Fifty 1 Labs, Inc Announces Acquisition of Drago Knives, LLC • CAFI • Jun 18, 2024 8:45 AM
Hydromer Announces Attainment of ISO 13485 Certification • HYDI • Jun 17, 2024 9:22 AM