Asus' FREE Speech Money Club

[john302]

That is one of the the silliest articles I've ever read.

"For example, the comparisons of Israelis to Nazis and of the Palestinian refugee camps to Auschwitz -- comparisons heard practically every day within the "enlightened" quarters of Europe -- can only be considered anti-Semitic."

Any comparison to Auschwitz is overblown, insensitive and probably rooted in anti-Semitism, but a comparison to Apartheid South Africa is fair.

"It is anti-Semitism, for instance, when Israel is singled out by the United Nations for human rights abuses while tried and true abusers like China, Iran, Cuba, and Syria are ignored."

No one ignores human rights abuses in those states, at least not any more than they do Israel. Straw man?

"the denial of Israel's right to exist is always anti-Semitic. If other peoples have a right to live securely in their homelands, then the Jewish people have a right to live securely in their homeland."

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/966952.html

^The Jews of Europe aren't even descendants of the original Jewish tribes, but Khazar converts. Quite a flimsy ground for claiming a "homeland".
Even so, today's african-american's wouldn't be justified in returning to africa and militarily forming their own country in their REAL "homeland", especially if that means displacing millions of people into shoddy refugee camps.

To be clear I think that after the atrocities of WWII the Jews deserve a country of their own, I just think it should have been cut out of Germany, instead of people who had nothing to do with their persecution.
Israel in it's current location is running on borrowed time, like the crusades of the middle ages. Once their militant neighbors achieve the threshold technology to make their attacks effective, I don't see how anyone would want to stay there.
To be clear I'm not anti-Semitic nor do I support violence.