Hmmmmmm...........let's see.
Could it be due to the current tanking strategy that Hemi conveyed earlier in the 2008 year?
Could it be that the expenses of Hemi are really not that large thus allowing even current oil pricing to support required revenue needs?
Could it be other possible revenue sources such as Tarrant County, maybe some other related servicing being performed by Hemi?? Just throwing some suggestions out there.
Could it be that KA positioned Hemi it be in this status based on the developments to date of the business plan of Hemi?
Again Badge, we know your probable answer to the above, as IMO the scope of such an opinion is very narrowed based on your specific actions to date.
And yes we all do agree and understand that only Hemi/KA can confirm.
But given the recent 2008 Hemi PR's and the recent 2008 going into 2009 Hemi actions; IMO, this information provided by the Hemi PR's, by the current Hemi actions now fully supported and documented by the KCC and based on some direct contact by some of us Hemi shareholders with Hemi Management puts me on the side of this Hemi fence argument and position.
Kels
