DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[Mike Tiernan]

Doug, no offense, but if I don't understand the test, where am I wrong? I posted a while back my interpretation of how the test is done - based upon DNAP's own writings - and if it is wrong, please tell me how. I also directly quoted DNAP as regards mechanism 3 - and their view matches my own exactly, _except_ that they assert is is "rare" while I consider it to be common.

Just don't say I don't understand the test. Tell me then the reality of the test.
Better yet, I'd love to hear from DNAP about these concerns about parentals and mech. 3 - but I guess that's all "proprietary" and we all have to take it on "faith."

I don't buy faith. I want evidence.