Followers | 101 |
Posts | 15364 |
Boards Moderated | 3 |
Alias Born | 12/06/2008 |
Saturday, February 21, 2009 2:44:10 PM
If "johnny come lately" owns 17% of outstanding shares and is working with two out of the remaining "big three" who incidentally have shown no official sign of resigning, then the scenario is possible. Not ethical, certainly not ethical. But possible.
I guess the crux is this: Who can muster 51% of shares voting?
Certainly, long time shareholders should keep their antennae out.
My personal opinion? Any new investment money will go where the old investment money went: Away.
This plan will go nowhere, but it will be interesting to watch.
Oohvie App Update Enhances Women's Health with Telemedicine and Online Scheduling • HLYK • Nov 11, 2024 8:00 AM
SANUWAVE Announces Record Quarterly Revenues: Q3 FY2024 Financial Results • SNWV • Nov 8, 2024 7:07 AM
DBG Pays Off $1.3 Million in Convertible Notes, which Retires All of the Company's Convertible Notes • DBGI • Nov 7, 2024 2:16 PM
SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service • SMX • Nov 7, 2024 8:48 AM
Rainmaker Worldwide Inc. (OTC: RAKR) Announces Successful Implementation of 1.6 Million Liter Per Day Wastewater Treatment Project in Iraq • RAKR • Nov 7, 2024 8:30 AM
SBC Medical Group Holdings and MEDIROM Healthcare Technologies Announce Business Alliance • SBC • Nov 7, 2024 7:00 AM