NeoMedia Technologies, Inc (NEOM)

[beam11]

Lets see here - When 95 is the same as or equal to 89 and 6 are repetitive of the 95 and you drop the repetitive 6 claims, I guess, in the warped mind of the EFF, that means the whole patent is narrowed and unenforceable, because 6 claims are the same as some of the others totaling 95 claims.

Lets do that again - 95 - 6 duplications = 89, not changed or deleted and no longer repetitive. Well, those 6 are good claims, so good the patent agent initially counted them twice, and now we are going to agree to count those 6 only once. So yeah, since they are duplications and will save the patent agent 5 days of writing time, we are ok with taking those 6 out, as they are duplications/repetitive and not necessary.

No need to count those suckers twice, as it saves all of us writing time (and to tell you the truth, we knew we might down the road have to give up something and that is the reason the claims were duplicated and repetitive in the first place).

This is actually the game played in reexaminations! You always give up the unnecessary and repetitive to settle!

Does any one want the B/S warped mind of the EFF, or a patent attorney like them representing them in a patent suit? No, I wouldn't. Not one word about prior art in the EFF's B/S write up. LOL! Did they give up on the prior art issue, as it was never an issue and their whole B/S petition was a joke!