InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 145
Posts 6227
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 09/04/2007

Re: juk post# 17168

Thursday, 02/19/2009 3:50:49 PM

Thursday, February 19, 2009 3:50:49 PM

Post# of 34414
HGLC: juk? You have done an exceptional job exposing Possible fraudulent or scam’ish like activities this company seems to be shown doing.
(According to their track records)

But I think all my disapprovals are pointless.
As per the Safe Harbor act clearly printed at the bottom of all that HGLC PR’ing, HGLC is not held accountable for anything they do or say and they’ve clearly took advantage of all the “POINT” words that clears them of liability to what they claim.

(Even though this Safe Harbor Act doesn’t really apply to pinks, it's still there. But, According to the SEC, PINKS aren’t Obligated under the same LAWS of reporting companies and are like ANTS scurrying around among the LIONS)

Remember, words like “INTENT” is a Scapegoat word.

Whereas, I can release a PR that reads;
I am in the “INTENT” to buy out HGLC and raise the PPS to $10 per share under my company.
I expect the shareholder would be very pleased with this “Acquisition”.

(Then as the date approaches I release another PR;)
In my last Statement given back on said date, where I’ve stated that I’ll (-at this point, I restate the previous PR as a filler buster), WE (I say ‘WE’ to take all the blame off myself), have experienced unforeseen circumstances out of our control that will delay the planned “Acquisition” regarding a company buy-out and increasing the shares to $10 per share.

(But to keep investors from getting pissed off and selling, which then costs me THEIR vested monies, I’ll add), We look forwards to remove all obstacles that may impair our “INTENT” (there’s that word again) so that our planned acquisition will allow for the "INTENT" of extraordinary share increase to $10 per share to occur in due process. This "INTENT" is without a reverse Split.

*As you can see, I just did a PR that made loads of Eye-Candy comments, but without ANY sound commitments. I simply “IMPLIED” and the Reading-Suckers did the rest.
But in all that verbiage, it never occurred to me that my own PPS sits at ‘.0001’/Ask with NO BID, for months.
But I’m counting on All Suckers to not be start enough to put it all together and therefore buy my shares based on what “I” PR’ed them with.

This scenario is what HGLC have told me by the actions they’ve taken.

It IS very simply to REVERSE this perception and I KNOW they know what that is.

Maintaining TRUTHS requires 'little to no effort' than Maintaining LIES.