InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 30
Posts 2664
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 10/26/2006

Re: None

Monday, 02/16/2009 11:23:00 AM

Monday, February 16, 2009 11:23:00 AM

Post# of 137667
Tuna...you sound just like me after I returned from Detroit after talking with emily for 40 minutes or so. I felt positive and that the company was going to do the right thing by us. They told me everything I wanted to hear including that it was not Peter's intent to hurt the shareholders with the RS. They were using it to get to a better exchange because they really didnt need the money so to speak. That was why they were going to fix the AS. Emily told me thatthe "fix was in" and that the amendment had already been applied for. That right there is what is making me sour. She didnt have to say that but she did. SO that makes her or Peter a liar. If Peter is still deliberating on whether to go ahead with the RS, that means it wont be proportionate. If it was proportionate, it wouldnt matter if they did right?


By [URL=http://profile.imageshack.us/user/clrmng1]clrmng1[/URL], shot with [URL=http://profile.imageshack.us/camerabuy.php?model=Canon+EOS+40D&make=Canon]Canon EOS 40D[/URL] at 2009-01-27