Not Taseko Mines

[NYBob]

Taseko submits Prosperity proposal

By Erin Hitchcock - Williams Lake Tribune

Published: January 27, 2009 8:00 AM
Updated: January 27, 2009 1:52 PM

5 Comments

The Prosperity Mine project will undergo an environmental assessment by a federal review panel, announced Canada’s Environment Minister Jim Prentice last week, but Brian Battison, vice president of corporate affairs for Taseko Mines Limited, says the announcement should have come a month ago.

“The decision was supposed to be made back on Dec. 18, so a month has been lost, and time is what’s most important to this project,” Battison says. “Time should not be wasted. We’re trying to make an $800 million investment decision. The federal government needs to be mindful that wasting time doesn’t lead to squandering the opportunity Prosperity represents.”

Battison notes that the provincial government’s process was issued on Jan. 9, and says the provincial environmental assessment decision is expected in October 2009, but there is no expectation when the federal decision will be.

“They were waiting for the federal government and I think they decided they didn’t want to wait any longer,” Battison says. “They have a process that they have to live up to, and they’re determined to go forward with theirs in a timely manner.”

On Friday, Taseko Mines Limited submitted its 3,000-page Environmental Assessment on the high-volume open pit gold-copper mine that would be built about 125 kilometres southwest of Williams Lake.

In addition to the mine and associated tailings and waste rock areas, the project includes an on-site mill, an approximately 125 kilometre-long power transmission line corridor and an access road.

According to the federal government’s terms of reference, the B.C. Environmental Assessment Statement will undertake a 30-day screening of the application against the Environmental Impact Statement guidelines. Once the B.C Environmental Assessment Office determines that the Environmental Impact Statement meets the requirements, Taseko will submit the impact statement to the panel.

Once submitted, the impact statement will be placed on the public registry and will be made available for public review and comment for 60 days.

Within 30 days of the public review of the impact statement being completed, the panel will determine if the EIS contains enough information to proceed to public hearings, which will be scheduled and announced within seven days and won’t begin until at least 30 days after announced.

Once the public hearings are complete, the panel will then prepare and submit a report describing the panel review process, the rationale, conclusions and recommendation to the Minister of Environment and the responsible authorities. The panel will also include a summary of comments received from the public and First Nations.

The report will be submitted within 60 days after the public hearings are complete. The Minister of Environment will then make the report available to the public.

But there is still no defined time when the minister would make a decision once he makes the panel’s report available to the public sometime after October.

“There is a timeline, but it takes us to October, but that’s only for the conclusion of the process,” Battison says. “The decision, there is no timeline attached to that.”

He stresses that time is of the essence in getting the project approved, and says eventually another opportunity for investment could come up that would compel the company to abandon plans for Prosperity Mine.

“Sooner or later, an opportunity is going to come along where our $800 million investment is a better risk-reward scenario in some other jurisdiction, maybe even in some other country of the world, and we will be compelled to go there, and what a shame that would be for this region,” Battison says. “What a shame personally, I think it would be, for a company that already has a mine in Williams Lake to not have been able to build another one because nobody fully understood the value and importance of time. It’s not a threat. It’s just the reality of the mining business. … When you squander time, you squander opportunity.”

Lucille Jamault, senior communications advisor for the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, couldn’t say why the federal environmental assessment wasn’t announced until this month, but she said that between November and December, 2008, there were open houses where guidelines were presented and the terms of reference finalized.

“There are no particular timelines for a minister to make a decision,” Jamault says, adding that the panel is independent from the government. “In terms of the minister’s decision, because it is a ministerial decision, I can’t comment on why or why not or when these things happen.”

In a Nov. 27 dated letter to the B.C. Environmental Assessment Office and the Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, Taseko Mines Limited president and CEO Russell Hallbauer also noted the urgency of time.

“If there is to be any reasonable chance of building Prosperity in the near term, i.e. have it built and operating in the next three years, then governments must take what some may see as extraordinary measures to ensure a reasonable and timely process,” the letter says.

“The project needs certainty and efficiency and there are aspects of the proposed timeline that provide neither.”
COMMENTS
COMMENTING ETIQUETTE: To encourage open exchange of ideas in the BCLocalNews.com community, we ask that you follow our guidelines and respect standards. Simply, don't say anything you wouldn't want your mother to read. More on etiquette...

Let's keep comments:

http://www.periodicos.com.ar/CANADA/bc.britishcolumbia.colombiebritannique.quesnel.quesnelcaribooobserver.php

* Civil
* Smart
* On-topic
* Free from profanity

All participants will register for an account. It's simple, takes seconds and will keep our comments free of trolls, cranks, and drive-by commenters.

As a community site, we ask that the community help by using the "Flag" button on each comment if they feel a comment has violated these rules. You can also use the 'up and down' arrows on each comment to voice your opinion about that particular comment.
close()

*
*
*
*
*
*
*

status via twitter

recent comments (follow comments)

View Profile »
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
closeReblog this comment
Powered by Disqus · Learn more
discussion by DISQUS
You are not logged in. (Log in)
# Subscribe: This thread
# Go to: My comments · Community Page
Sort thread by:
5 Comments

Thanks. Your comment is awaiting approval by a moderator.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.

Please login to comment.

*
o ^
o v
o Permalink
o Admin
o
+
+
+ Report Spam
+ Remove Post
+ Block username
+ Block email
+ Block IP address
Fran_ces 21 hours ago 1 point

Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
international law or not, you may think you own the land, but how can a piece of paper say the land belongs to the Tsilhqotin people, when honestly no one actually owns land. it has been here a lot longer then humans have.
reply edit record video comment reblog flag
1 /people/Fran_ces/ /people/Fran_ces/follow/
*
o ^
o v
o Parent
o Permalink
o Admin
o
+
+
+ Report Spam
+ Remove Post
+ Block username
+ Block email
+ Block IP address
fallacybgtime 20 hours ago 1 point

Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
Exactly, you hit it on the spot, my friend! How can a piece of paper say that is belongs to the Tsilhqotin? Written information on paper is foreign and does not belong to any First Nations throughout. Therefore they have Oral Tradition which has been passed down from generation to generation since time immemorial. They were here long before the paper came about. The history states that First Nations have lived here since time immemorial (Norh America). Many have not to this day signed or sold any of there lands to any foreign governments on paper whether it be called Treaties or other fancy names like Prosperity. The Tsilhqotins have not agreed or signed any Treaties to foreigners and is likely not going to in the near future. Again, please do not be ignorant and agree for the mine to continue with it's damage to the environment.
reply edit record video comment reblog flag
1 /people/fallacybgtime/ /people/fallacybgtime/follow/
*
o ^
o v
o Permalink
o Admin
o
+
+
+ Report Spam
+ Remove Post
+ Block username
+ Block email
+ Block IP address
can57al 1 day ago 1 point

Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
The land definently belongs to the Tsilhqotin people. It's easy for people to say they support the mines when they don't even own the land or have anything to do with growing up there. If you grew up there it would be a different story. I'm sick of this greed, sure it can create jobs but a beautiful piece of land is being destroyed which cannot be replaced. The Tsilhqotin's will fight for whats thiers and I'm behind them and so are people who are not nasty and greedy, people with good hearts. People can find jobs elsewhere, don't hope for the mines to get work, there are other resources.
reply edit record video comment reblog flag
1 /people/can57al/ /people/can57al/follow/
*
o ^
o v
o Permalink
o Admin
o
+
+
+ Report Spam
+ Remove Post
+ Block username
+ Block email
+ Block IP address
rosey27 4 days ago 1 point

Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
We need jobs in this area, I am from 100 mile house. With the environmental regulations the way they are today if it is not done right it cant proceed. I can be pretty sure taseko mines is doing its part to move this forward properly. Like I said we need jobs. The environment is part of any reputable company's way of doing business it just cant be any other way these days. I support Taseko and the prosperity project 100 %
Chris Rosendale, 100 Mile house, BC
reply edit record video comment reblog flag
1 /people/rosey27/ /people/rosey27/follow/
*


fallacybgtime 6 days ago 1 point

Please login to rate.

Do you already have an account? Log in and claim this comment.
No pressure? Come on, why are we rushing when nature took millions of years to build it the way it is. Just leave it alone and don't let a piece of paper say that it is okay to damage the natural environment . Do not forget that the land belongs to the Tsilhqotin people. International Law states that the land belongs to them, the original owners of the land since time immemorial.
reply edit record video comment reblog flag