InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 43
Posts 3041
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 08/09/2006

Re: DIOSMIO3 post# 548

Wednesday, 02/04/2009 11:01:09 AM

Wednesday, February 04, 2009 11:01:09 AM

Post# of 647
They obviously saw the 140,000 share float that would have remained with a 100 to 1 reverse split as too much of an obstacle. I was expecting no larger split than that.

This definitely is about self dealing. They are in this to make as much as possible. As far as the shareholders of the TMXU shell, I think their attitude is that they don't have any fiduciary responsibility to shareholders from the previous company.

If you look at what happened to PFAP's share price, you can see how they might have reached the conclusion that they needed to reduce the float drastically if they cared about the share price of their future endeavors.



Only the beginning.

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.