There was no real attempt to acquire DNAG. It was just another ploy. If they wanted anything they just have to ask Dutchess and they can get anything they want at fire sale prices. Be assured that if Dutchess could see any way to recover any of their losses at a better rate than the sale of .0002 shares, they would jump at the chance.
I'm not a science expert, so many of the patents don't mean much to me...but when i see people that are experts in their field having an interest in buying DNAG, that gains my interest.
That is a very good point, but may I suggest that you are misapplying it. Consider that there are countless experts in the fields of expertise involving the patents and intellectual property of DNAG. If the patents have any value then those experts would be well aware of it and would be interested in it and excited over the possibilities of the applications. Yet over the almost a decade timeframe that DNAG has been the subject of discussion on these boards, not one practitioner of the science ever appeared here and supported the technology. Not one. That is a very unlikely happenstance if the technology is valid, don't you think?
can you expand a bit for me on why you think the patents are worthless?
Patents are interesting things and the patent process is fairly arcane. You need to understand how it works before you can understand the limitations of DNAG patents.
A patent application has two independent sections, the summary explanation section and the claims section. It is important to understand that only the claims section is 'patented'. Let me give you a hypothetical example.
Suppose you want to patent the wheel. You write a summary explanation that tells about all of the benefits of your invention, how it will revolutionize civilization and lead to incredible engineering feats, your summary is a wonder of hope and promise. Then in the claims section you list a thousand specific applications of your new invention, tires, wheels, gears, cogs, bearings, mechanisms derived from these things, gearboxes, clocks, automobiles, bicycles, etc.
Now suppose that almost all of the claims are rejected by the patent office because they are either obvious or already in use. You are left with a single claim, #856 that lists a wheel application for the tiny skateboard in a flea circus. Only one claim is approved.
Not much value huh?
However, anyone that reads the application for the approved patent will still read the original summary explanation it is unchanged from the original application. Even though the actual patent has no value, the front page remains unchanged.
That is the case with DNAG patents. If you research them carefully and track the 'claims' as the patent works its way through the process you will see that in almost every instance the original claims are diminished or abandoned until not one of them exists in it's original form and very few of them remain at all. The remaining claims are trivial shreds of their original form. Yet the front page with all it's flowery promise remains intact. A now misleading facade to a document that has only one value. To impress those not familiar with the process.
I hope this helps you understand. If you have any questions please ask. I have a great familiarity with the patant office as I hold five ptents myself.
regards,
frog
AI
