Redwood Group International (RDWD)

[rangersteve6403]

Karin if that's the case shame on Bickel for not knowing the costs when going into it. That is a direct reflection on his lack of knowledge of the market in general IMO. Not what I would call even a poor leader much less mediocre. He should have known every cost, the fact that it's hard to run it through the first time, why he hired help to get S3 uplisted, and if he ever had any intentions of doing so or was it a smoke screen. After all without transparency he can print another billion shares to sell to cover the cost. reverse splits don't hurt him since he can keep awarding himself more shares. I don't think he'll report or be transparant. Why should he when that's a reason to stay on the pinks. My guess is next we hear on O/S we'll be over 2 billion.

In closing I don't think he cares about shareholders. He wants to fund his retirement and weekly pay check. JMO I can only hope I'm wrong but common sense tells me no way!



Karin CA said
"Filing of the S1 showed intent to become a transparent company. Missing the table in the S1A created the need for another filing coupled with more expense which must have got them thinking about the continuing expenses of uplisting???

Staying a pink doesn't bother me IF they continue reporting. I found something interesting last night."