InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 7
Posts 789
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 11/20/2003

Re: jerseyboy post# 25652

Saturday, 01/31/2009 9:33:30 AM

Saturday, January 31, 2009 9:33:30 AM

Post# of 35633

-If CTGI is not in default with La Jolla and elects to stay in there and hang in there would not have been such a dramtic
sell off of CTGI shares .

I would think that if CTGI shares were issued to LaJolla they
would have held onto their shares since LAJolla would have
a better idea based upon representations to them of their
future prospects and what and how soon things were supposed to happen in 2009.

On the other hand there could be a simple explanation that CTGI need money to pay either their overhead such as rent
salaries ,legal expenses ,judgement satisfaction or
marketing or money to start up
the Co2 carbon capture subsidiary and is only temporary.

Maybe a better thing would have been to have a private
placement to all of the existing shareholders attached
with a warrant to buy the shares at a certain price into the future based upon certain milestones they expect to accomplish

Just my thoughts any other thoughts

Regards,
bbhuey









,

shares

Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.