DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[mingwan0]

On the issue of it being taken seriously, leaving aside things like Moffitt, collaboration with Shriver and McKeigue, and the patent application, there is always:

Frudakis T, Venkateswarlu K, Thomas MJ, Gaskin Z, Ginjupalli S, Gunturi S, Ponnuswamy V, Natarajan S, Nachimuthu PK. A classifier for the SNP-based inference of ancestry. J Forensic Sci. 2003 Jul;48(4):771-82.

Unless of course the Journal of Forensic Science is not going to be considered a serious publication (not to mention Trends in Genetics). Publication in peer reviewed journals is being taken seriously enough in my book, even if they are not quite Nature lol.