<Exagerrated? Birth/death rate is currently understating unemployment.>
Yessiree.
<... you could make a case that the statistics create the impression that 7.2% or 13.5% of the households are without a wage earner, which is not the case as it would have been in the 1930's due to the advent of the 2-income household.>
u could also make the argument that you create the same meltdowns today if you lose one wage earner.
<It's likely U-6 extrapolated per household would be more like 8%-10% of households without a wage earner. That's still about 70% lower than the peak of the Great Depression...>
Give it time.<ng> Coxe's Achilles heel is his take on future unemployment rates.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.