Drinks Americas Holdings, Ltd. (DKAM)

[sneaky_peaky]

In the long run, I see the sparkling vodka potentially being worth $1B, the Trump brand being worth $1B, and Kid Rock beer being worth many billion, but lets just use $1B, so that totals $3B, with about 100M shares out, that's $30 a share.

Pump. Not fair to newbies as you state.

Now let's say we buy Labatt, which is a regional beer in the U.S., and it takes 100M shares at $1(I believe it will be a lot more shares but I'm using sneaky's number),

Now you corroborate the implications of the future only to turn around a few hours later and blast anyone who discusses it.

This stock will be at $1 when someone decides they want 2-5 million shares, selling 100M shares at $1 is just plain stupid when we have brands coming out that should in the long run propel what's already in hand to $20-$30+.

Again, reinforcing the pump so newbies think this is even more affirmation that $30+ is coming.

Some will say that I'm complaining that the stock will only top out at $10 in the long run if Drinks makes this acquisition and has to use 300M shares to do it, but that is still a 4000% gain from here, but that's not my point, my point is that nobody should be allowed to buy 100M shares of DKAM at $1 for any reason at this point, if they want to pay $5 a share for a huge amount of off the market shares, I'm okay with that, but to only pay $1 and get to come in with the whole story about to unfold in a minute just isn't fair to us shareholders this late in the game.IMO

Doing business and talking future business is OK as long as nobody gets a good deal. I'm gald we're seeing loudy clear now.

Posted by: cautionupahead Date: Sunday, January 25, 2009 4:50:09 PM
In reply to: None Post # of 29435

Here's my take on Labatt: I hope we don't buy it! In the long run, I see the sparkling vodka potentially being worth $1B, the Trump brand being worth $1B, and Kid Rock beer being worth many billion, but lets just use $1B, so that totals $3B, with about 100M shares out, that's $30 a share. Now let's say we buy Labatt, which is a regional beer in the U.S., and it takes 100M shares at $1(I believe it will be a lot more shares but I'm using sneaky's number), now that $3B is divided into 200M shares, so we're looking at $15 a share instead of $30, but here's the kicker, those lucky investors that get to buy 100M shares at $1 don't even care about the Labatt purchase, that's just icing on the cake, because what they really get to do is buy 100M shares of Drinks Americas outside the market for $1. This stock will be at $1 when someone decides they want 2-5 million shares, selling 100M shares at $1 is just plain stupid when we have brands coming out that should in the long run propel what's already in hand to $20-$30+. If Drinks Americas stock was sitting at $10+ now, that would be a different story. Plus Labatt is regional, obviously AB didn't think it was a national beer, if it was national right now that would be great because a beer pipeline would already be open and Drinks could take advantage of that for Kid Rock beer, but doubling the OS for a regional pipeline is far too expensive to me. Plus the article I read said whoever gets Labatt USA will be buying the brewery too, which is good for making Kid Rock beer in house, but like I said, that means it's going to be a lot more than 100M shares. Some will say that I'm complaining that the stock will only top out at $10 in the long run if Drinks makes this acquisition and has to use 300M shares to do it, but that is still a 4000% gain from here, but that's not my point, my point is that nobody should be allowed to buy 100M shares of DKAM at $1 for any reason at this point, if they want to pay $5 a share for a huge amount of off the market shares, I'm okay with that, but to only pay $1 and get to come in with the whole story about to unfold in a minute just isn't fair to us shareholders this late in the game.IMO