dean baker believes the 'ethnic' cleansing of various forms of 'frenzied' speculating in the Market, by financial transaction taxation, will bring in as much as 100 billion $ annually. how does an economist come to that conclusion when the very taxation will exclude such participation? does he think the Market will be the final resting place of the buy and hold 'investor', who is now deemed the dupe of policy and lack of regulation? he better rethink his flawed theory
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.