DNAprint Genomics (DNAG)

[dgplexus]

"frogdreaming,"

Substantiate your claims if you wish to convince anyone. "It is a scam company run by liars and cheats" is simply an unsubstantiated personal attack against the company's officers and employees, the kind of empty accusation that I consider is worth less than nothing. DNAPrint Genomics is the real deal; there is nothing about the company, its products, its intellectual property, or its experience/expertise, that is remotely a "scam."

Perhaps you are forgetting how many parties consider DNAPrint Genomics and its technologies in a very favorable light.

Google search: DNAPrint cutting edge
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=DNAPrint+cutting+edge&aq=f&oq=

Google News search: DNAPrint cutting edge
http://news.google.com/archivesearch?hl=en&um=1&ie=UTF-8&tab=wn&q=DNAPrint+cutting+edge

There are many other examples, of how highly regarded the company and its technologies, and products, are. Here's one Wired article, that you seem to have forgotten:

The Inconvenient Science of Racial DNA Profiling
By Melba Newsome 10.05.07
http://www.wired.com/science/discoveries/news/2007/10/dnaprint/?currentPage=all

Oh, heck, here's another bone I'll throw to you:

"On the recommendation of DNAPrint, we also excluded samples with 40 or more failed markers"

From:
The population-based National Down Syndrome Project combined
epidemiological and molecular methods to study congenital heart
defects in Down syndrome
March 2008 Vol. 10 No. 3
http://www.genetics.emory.edu/DSC/research/pubs/freeman.pdf
Authors list:
Sallie B. Freeman, PhD1, Lora H. Bean, PhD1, Emily G. Allen, PhD1, Stuart W. Tinker, BS1, Adam E. Locke, BA1,
Charlotte Druschel, MD, MPH2, Charlotte A. Hobbs, MD, PhD3, Paul A. Romitti, PhD4, Marjorie H. Royle, PhD5,
Claudine P. Torfs, PhD6, Kenneth J. Dooley, MD7, and Stephanie L. Sherman, PhD1

It appears some very well qualified people (including the authors listed above) take the advice of DNAPrint Genomics quite seriously. This is not compatible with your claims, "frogdreaming."

The burden of conspiracy claims lies on the person(s) putting forth the claim(s.) Substantiate your claims, or withdraw them.

Daniel